YAY!!!!!!!! Wonder where they're going have it though

"That's what she said."

Ron Paul 2012

I agree with that decision.  I didn't read the link...will the location be moved to another location?  I don't see him getting a fair trial after all the media coverage here.  Unless you live under a rock you know what is going on.

We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails. 

YES!  Thank you for posting this!

LOL The comment at the bottom regarding the ghost of Rachel.

"Sometimes the road less traveled is less traveled for a reason."

-Jerry Seinfeld

Word.

yes. lol at more rachel whining!! that woman is seriously mentally disconnected.

If I were face to face with her, I'd call her a twit and walk away

"That's what she said."

Ron Paul 2012

This is great news. It is better that ten guilty persons escape than one innocent suffer.

Earn cash in your spare time, blackmail your friends.

I'm glad. My sister, who had him as a student, will be overjoyed.

The Enquirer says this. The pdf is the actual court document.

"The court has determined that there were external matters discussed in deliberations...These matters constitute a violation of a Sixth Amendment right and due process," states the ruling from Common Pleas Judge Neal Bronson.

• Widmer Ruling (PDF)

Want to make the most of the site? Click here!
Moderator of this fantastic forum.

originally posted by OHmom1

I'm glad. My sister, who had him as a student, will be overjoyed.

 

The Enquirer says this. The pdf is the actual court document.

 

 

"The court has determined that there were external matters discussed in deliberations...These matters constitute a violation of a Sixth Amendment right and due process," states the ruling from Common Pleas Judge Neal Bronson.

• Widmer Ruling (PDF)

 

---

Want to make the most of the site? Click here!
Moderator of this fantastic forum.

There are many happy people today. It's a bright shiny day afterall!

Earn cash in your spare time, blackmail your friends.

Will he get out pending the new trial?  Wasn't he out on bond before he was convicted...or am I remembering incorrectly?

I don't understand why an experiement on hair-drying wasn't done officially - since the dry hair was a major part fo the argument............why leave out what seems so obvious that those jurors felt the need to find out on their own?

stupid move by the lawyers - hope they remedy that for the next trial.

That brain of yours can do more than hold your ears apart...take it out for a spin.....